
Canagliflozin
Description
Historical Context of SGLT2 Inhibitor Development for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
The journey towards SGLT2 inhibitors began with the discovery of phlorizin in 1835, a natural compound isolated from apple tree bark. Phlorizin was observed to induce glucosuria (glucose in the urine) and consequently lower blood glucose levels cardioaragon.comworksinprogress.coectrx.org. Early research in the mid-20th century elucidated that glucose reabsorption in the kidneys, primarily in the proximal tubules, was an active transport process involving sodium-glucose cotransport cardioaragon.comnih.govbjd-abcd.comahajournals.org. This led to the identification of specific sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) proteins.
The critical discovery was the identification of SGLT1 and SGLT2. SGLT2, predominantly located in the S1 and S2 segments of the proximal renal tubules, is responsible for reabsorbing approximately 90% of the filtered glucose, while SGLT1 handles the remaining 10% and is also found in the intestine nih.govahajournals.orgnih.govdovepress.comjnjmedicalconnect.comnih.gove-dmj.orgmdpi.com. The understanding that SGLT2 played a pivotal role in renal glucose reabsorption provided a distinct therapeutic target for managing hyperglycemia in T2DM. Phlorizin, while demonstrating the principle, had limitations due to its non-selective inhibition of both SGLT1 and SGLT2, leading to gastrointestinal side effects and poor oral bioavailability ectrx.orgnih.govbjd-abcd.com.
Subsequent research focused on developing more selective and orally active derivatives of phlorizin. This led to the creation of synthetic compounds, including C-glucosides, which offered improved pharmacokinetic stability and enhanced selectivity for SGLT2 ectrx.orgbjd-abcd.comnih.govfrontiersin.org. This scientific progression culminated in the development of a new class of oral antihyperglycemic agents: the SGLT2 inhibitors nih.govfrontiersin.orgnih.govwikipedia.orgahdbonline.comdovepress.combjcardio.co.ukdiabetesonthenet.com.
Significance of Canagliflozin as a First-in-Class SGLT2 Inhibitor
This compound holds significant historical importance as the first SGLT2 inhibitor to receive regulatory approval in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 29, 2013 nih.govnih.govnih.govfrontiersin.orgnih.govahdbonline.comdrugs.commedscape.comwikipedia.orgresearchgate.netresearchgate.net. Subsequently, it gained approval in the European Union in November 2013 and in Australia in September 2013 wikipedia.org. Its approval marked the introduction of a novel therapeutic class for T2DM, offering an insulin-independent mechanism of action ahajournals.orgnih.govdovepress.comjnjmedicalconnect.comnih.gove-dmj.orgmdpi.comahdbonline.combjcardio.co.ukmedscape.comresearchgate.nettga.gov.au.
The primary mechanism of this compound involves the competitive and selective inhibition of SGLT2 in the renal proximal tubules. This action reduces the reabsorption of filtered glucose, lowers the renal threshold for glucose, and consequently increases urinary glucose excretion (UGE) ahajournals.orgnih.govdovepress.comjnjmedicalconnect.comahdbonline.comresearchgate.nettga.gov.au. This process leads to a reduction in plasma glucose levels and an associated caloric loss due to glucose excretion, contributing to weight reduction wikipedia.orgahdbonline.comdovepress.combjcardio.co.ukresearchgate.nettga.gov.au. Early clinical studies demonstrated that this compound improved glycemic control, reduced body weight, and lowered blood pressure, establishing its unique profile among antidiabetic agents wikipedia.orgahdbonline.comdovepress.commedscape.comresearchgate.netresearchgate.net. The development and approval of this compound paved the way for further research and the subsequent introduction of other SGLT2 inhibitors into clinical practice.
Current Research Landscape and Knowledge Gaps concerning this compound
Research into this compound has expanded significantly beyond its initial indication for T2DM, revealing multifaceted benefits in cardiovascular and renal protection. Current research continues to explore its mechanisms of action, optimal use in various patient populations, and potential novel applications.
Glycemic Control and Metabolic Effects: this compound has consistently demonstrated efficacy in improving glycemic control in patients with T2DM. Clinical trials have shown significant reductions in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels compared to placebo and active comparators nih.govahdbonline.comresearchgate.net. For instance, studies have reported mean HbA1c reductions of approximately 0.9% to 1.2% with daily doses of this compound nih.gov. Beyond glycemic control, this compound has been associated with modest reductions in body weight and blood pressure, observed across multiple studies wikipedia.orgahdbonline.comdovepress.combjcardio.co.ukresearchgate.netresearchgate.netnih.gov. Pooled analyses from phase 3 studies indicated reductions in systolic blood pressure of approximately 4-5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure of 2 mmHg compared to placebo dovepress.com.
Cardiovascular and Renal Protection: A significant area of ongoing research and clinical interest is the cardiovascular and renal protective potential of this compound. Landmark trials such as the this compound Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) program and the this compound and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial have provided substantial evidence. The CANVAS program demonstrated a significant reduction in the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke dovepress.comnih.govnsw.gov.aupcronline.com. Furthermore, this compound has shown a reduction in hospitalizations for heart failure dovepress.comnih.gov.
In terms of renal outcomes, this compound has exhibited renoprotective effects. The CREDENCE trial reported a 30% reduction in the risk of renal failure or death in patients with T2DM and chronic kidney disease (CKD) nsw.gov.au. This compound has also been shown to reduce albuminuria and slow the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) dovepress.comdovepress.comresearchgate.netfrontiersin.org. Research is also exploring the impact of this compound on kidney oxygenation and potential mechanisms underlying its renal benefits, such as effects on mitochondrial function and podocyte protection mdpi.comfrontiersin.org.
Current Research Landscape and Knowledge Gaps: While substantial progress has been made, several knowledge gaps persist. The precise molecular mechanisms underlying the broad cardiovascular and renal benefits, particularly in non-diabetic populations, are still being elucidated researchgate.netahajournals.orgoaepublish.com. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term implications of these effects and to clarify the comparative benefits and risks across different patient profiles and in combination with other therapies oaepublish.comresearchgate.net. Investigations into the signaling pathways involved in fluid removal, atherosclerosis, and hypertension are ongoing researchgate.net. Additionally, studies are exploring the potential of this compound in other conditions, highlighting its evolving role in multisystem disease management worksinprogress.cofrontiersin.org.
Data Tables
The following tables summarize key research findings from clinical studies involving this compound, focusing on efficacy and metabolic parameters.
Table 1: Glycemic Control Improvements with this compound in Clinical Studies
Parameter | Comparison Group | Mean Change (vs. Comparator) | Duration (Weeks) | Reference(s) |
HbA1c (%) | Placebo | -0.75 to -1.20 | 52-104 | nih.govresearchgate.net |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mmol/L) | Placebo | -1.0 to -2.0 | 12-52 | nih.govahdbonline.com |
Note: Values represent typical findings from pooled analyses or representative studies. Specific values may vary depending on the study design and patient population.
Table 2: Metabolic Effects of this compound in Clinical Studies
Parameter | Comparison Group | Mean Change (vs. Comparator) | Duration (Weeks) | Reference(s) |
Body Weight (kg) | Placebo | -1.5 to -3.0 | 26-52 | dovepress.comahdbonline.comdovepress.comresearchgate.net |
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | Placebo | -3.7 to -5.4 | 12-52 | ahdbonline.comdovepress.com |
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) | Placebo | -1.5 to -2.0 | 12-52 | ahdbonline.comdovepress.com |
Note: Values represent typical findings from pooled analyses or representative studies. Specific values may vary depending on the study design and patient population.
Table 3: Cardiovascular and Renal Outcome Benefits of this compound
Outcome | Relative Risk Reduction (vs. Placebo) | Reference(s) |
Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke (CANVAS Program) | 14% | dovepress.comnih.gov |
Hospitalization for Heart Failure (CANVAS Program) | 33% | dovepress.comnih.gov |
Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for HF (CREDENCE Trial) | 20% | ahajournals.org |
Composite of renal death, end-stage kidney disease, or sustained 40% eGFR decline (CREDENCE Trial) | 30% | nsw.gov.auahajournals.orgjnjmedicalconnect.com |
Albuminuria progression (Phase II trials) | 27% (HR 0.73) | dovepress.com |
Note: MI = Myocardial Infarction; CV = Cardiovascular; eGFR = estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; HR = Hazard Ratio. Values are indicative of findings from major clinical trials.
Compound Names Mentioned
this compound
Phlorizin
Metformin
Sitagliptin
Glimepiride
Dapagliflozin
Empagliflozin
Ertugliflozin
Tofogliflozin
Sotagliflozin
Remogliflozin etabonate
Sergliflozin etabonate
Enavogliflozin
Insulin
Sulfonylurea
GLP-1 receptor agonists
DPP-4 inhibitors
Thiazolidinediones
Properties
IUPAC Name |
(2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-2-[3-[[5-(4-fluorophenyl)thiophen-2-yl]methyl]-4-methylphenyl]-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4,5-triol | |
---|---|---|
Source | PubChem | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | |
Description | Data deposited in or computed by PubChem | |
InChI |
InChI=1S/C24H25FO5S/c1-13-2-3-15(24-23(29)22(28)21(27)19(12-26)30-24)10-16(13)11-18-8-9-20(31-18)14-4-6-17(25)7-5-14/h2-10,19,21-24,26-29H,11-12H2,1H3/t19-,21-,22+,23-,24+/m1/s1 | |
Source | PubChem | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | |
Description | Data deposited in or computed by PubChem | |
InChI Key |
XTNGUQKDFGDXSJ-ZXGKGEBGSA-N | |
Source | PubChem | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | |
Description | Data deposited in or computed by PubChem | |
Canonical SMILES |
CC1=C(C=C(C=C1)C2C(C(C(C(O2)CO)O)O)O)CC3=CC=C(S3)C4=CC=C(C=C4)F | |
Source | PubChem | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | |
Description | Data deposited in or computed by PubChem | |
Isomeric SMILES |
CC1=C(C=C(C=C1)[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O2)CO)O)O)O)CC3=CC=C(S3)C4=CC=C(C=C4)F | |
Source | PubChem | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | |
Description | Data deposited in or computed by PubChem | |
Molecular Formula |
C24H25FO5S | |
Source | PubChem | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | |
Description | Data deposited in or computed by PubChem | |
DSSTOX Substance ID |
DTXSID601004469 | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | EPA DSSTox | |
URL | https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/DTXSID601004469 | |
Description | DSSTox provides a high quality public chemistry resource for supporting improved predictive toxicology. | |
Molecular Weight |
444.5 g/mol | |
Source | PubChem | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | |
Description | Data deposited in or computed by PubChem | |
Boiling Point |
642.9±55.0 | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | DrugBank | |
URL | https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB08907 | |
Description | The DrugBank database is a unique bioinformatics and cheminformatics resource that combines detailed drug (i.e. chemical, pharmacological and pharmaceutical) data with comprehensive drug target (i.e. sequence, structure, and pathway) information. | |
Explanation | Creative Common's Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode) | |
Solubility |
almost insoluble, Practically insoluble in aqueous media from pH 1.1 to pH 12.9 /Canagliflozin hemihydrate/ | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | DrugBank | |
URL | https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB08907 | |
Description | The DrugBank database is a unique bioinformatics and cheminformatics resource that combines detailed drug (i.e. chemical, pharmacological and pharmaceutical) data with comprehensive drug target (i.e. sequence, structure, and pathway) information. | |
Explanation | Creative Common's Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode) | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB) | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/source/hsdb/8284 | |
Description | The Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB) is a toxicology database that focuses on the toxicology of potentially hazardous chemicals. It provides information on human exposure, industrial hygiene, emergency handling procedures, environmental fate, regulatory requirements, nanomaterials, and related areas. The information in HSDB has been assessed by a Scientific Review Panel. | |
CAS No. |
842133-18-0 | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | CAS Common Chemistry | |
URL | https://commonchemistry.cas.org/detail?cas_rn=842133-18-0 | |
Description | CAS Common Chemistry is an open community resource for accessing chemical information. Nearly 500,000 chemical substances from CAS REGISTRY cover areas of community interest, including common and frequently regulated chemicals, and those relevant to high school and undergraduate chemistry classes. This chemical information, curated by our expert scientists, is provided in alignment with our mission as a division of the American Chemical Society. | |
Explanation | The data from CAS Common Chemistry is provided under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, unless otherwise stated. | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | ChemIDplus | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/substance/?source=chemidplus&sourceid=0842133180 | |
Description | ChemIDplus is a free, web search system that provides access to the structure and nomenclature authority files used for the identification of chemical substances cited in National Library of Medicine (NLM) databases, including the TOXNET system. | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | DrugBank | |
URL | https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB08907 | |
Description | The DrugBank database is a unique bioinformatics and cheminformatics resource that combines detailed drug (i.e. chemical, pharmacological and pharmaceutical) data with comprehensive drug target (i.e. sequence, structure, and pathway) information. | |
Explanation | Creative Common's Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode) | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | EPA DSSTox | |
URL | https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/DTXSID601004469 | |
Description | DSSTox provides a high quality public chemistry resource for supporting improved predictive toxicology. | |
Record name | (1S)-1,5-Anhydro-1-C-(3-{[5-(4-fluorophenyl)thiophen-2-yl]methyl]}-4-methylphenyl)-D-glucitol | |
Source | European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) | |
URL | https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals | |
Description | The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) is an agency of the European Union which is the driving force among regulatory authorities in implementing the EU's groundbreaking chemicals legislation for the benefit of human health and the environment as well as for innovation and competitiveness. | |
Explanation | Use of the information, documents and data from the ECHA website is subject to the terms and conditions of this Legal Notice, and subject to other binding limitations provided for under applicable law, the information, documents and data made available on the ECHA website may be reproduced, distributed and/or used, totally or in part, for non-commercial purposes provided that ECHA is acknowledged as the source: "Source: European Chemicals Agency, http://echa.europa.eu/". Such acknowledgement must be included in each copy of the material. ECHA permits and encourages organisations and individuals to create links to the ECHA website under the following cumulative conditions: Links can only be made to webpages that provide a link to the Legal Notice page. | |
Record name | CANAGLIFLOZIN ANHYDROUS | |
Source | FDA Global Substance Registration System (GSRS) | |
URL | https://gsrs.ncats.nih.gov/ginas/app/beta/substances/6S49DGR869 | |
Description | The FDA Global Substance Registration System (GSRS) enables the efficient and accurate exchange of information on what substances are in regulated products. Instead of relying on names, which vary across regulatory domains, countries, and regions, the GSRS knowledge base makes it possible for substances to be defined by standardized, scientific descriptions. | |
Explanation | Unless otherwise noted, the contents of the FDA website (www.fda.gov), both text and graphics, are not copyrighted. They are in the public domain and may be republished, reprinted and otherwise used freely by anyone without the need to obtain permission from FDA. Credit to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as the source is appreciated but not required. | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB) | |
URL | https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/source/hsdb/8284 | |
Description | The Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB) is a toxicology database that focuses on the toxicology of potentially hazardous chemicals. It provides information on human exposure, industrial hygiene, emergency handling procedures, environmental fate, regulatory requirements, nanomaterials, and related areas. The information in HSDB has been assessed by a Scientific Review Panel. | |
Melting Point |
68-72 | |
Record name | Canagliflozin | |
Source | DrugBank | |
URL | https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB08907 | |
Description | The DrugBank database is a unique bioinformatics and cheminformatics resource that combines detailed drug (i.e. chemical, pharmacological and pharmaceutical) data with comprehensive drug target (i.e. sequence, structure, and pathway) information. | |
Explanation | Creative Common's Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode) | |
Mechanistic Basis of Canagliflozin Action
Selective Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibition
Localization and Physiological Role of SGLT2 in Renal Glucose Reabsorption
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) is a protein primarily expressed in the S1 and S2 segments of the proximal renal tubules in the kidneys. nih.govahdbonline.com Under normal physiological conditions, the kidneys filter approximately 180 grams of glucose from the blood daily. nih.gov SGLT2 is responsible for the reabsorption of the vast majority, about 90%, of this filtered glucose. nih.gov This process of reabsorbing glucose back into the bloodstream is crucial for the body's energy conservation and maintenance of glucose homeostasis. nih.gov The remaining 10% of glucose is reabsorbed by the sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1), which is located more distally in the proximal tubules. jnjmedicalconnect.com
Canagliflozin's Affinity and Potency for Human SGLT2 versus SGLT1
This compound functions as a competitive and reversible inhibitor of SGLT2. It exhibits a high degree of selectivity and potency for human SGLT2 compared to SGLT1. jnjmedicalconnect.com In vitro studies have determined that this compound has a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for SGLT2 in the range of 2.2 to 4.2 nM. jocmr.orgmdpi.com In contrast, its IC50 for SGLT1 is significantly higher, approximately 663 to 910 nM. jocmr.orgmdpi.com This demonstrates that this compound is about 150 to over 400 times more selective for SGLT2 than for SGLT1. jnjmedicalconnect.commdpi.com This selectivity ensures that its primary action is targeted at the main site of renal glucose reabsorption.
Table 1: Comparative Inhibitory Potency of this compound
Transporter | Mean IC50 (nM) | Selectivity Ratio (SGLT1/SGLT2) |
---|---|---|
Human SGLT2 | 2.2 - 4.2 | ~150 - 400 fold |
Human SGLT1 | 663 - 910 |
Consequences of SGLT2 Inhibition: Glucosuria and Lowered Renal Threshold for Glucose (RTG)
By inhibiting SGLT2, this compound reduces the reabsorption of filtered glucose in the kidneys, leading to an increase in urinary glucose excretion (UGE), a condition known as glucosuria. jnjmedicalconnect.comuspharmacist.com A primary consequence of this action is the lowering of the renal threshold for glucose (RTG), which is the plasma glucose concentration at which glucose starts to be excreted in the urine. jnjmedicalconnect.com In individuals without diabetes, the typical RTG is around 180 mg/dL. uspharmacist.com this compound lowers this threshold in a dose-dependent manner, with maximal suppression reducing the RTG to a range of approximately 70 to 90 mg/dL. jnjmedicalconnect.com This lowered threshold results in the excretion of glucose at much lower blood concentrations than normal, leading to a caloric loss and a reduction in plasma glucose levels. jnjmedicalconnect.compatsnap.com
Insulin-Independent Glucose Homeostasis Modulation
Impact on Fasting and Postprandial Plasma Glucose Levels
A key feature of this compound's mechanism is that it is independent of insulin action or secretion. nih.govdovepress.com This allows it to be effective in managing blood glucose levels across different stages of type 2 diabetes. nih.gov The inhibition of SGLT2 and subsequent glucosuria directly results in a decrease in both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG). mdpi.com The reduction in FPG is a result of the continuous excretion of glucose in the urine, while the lowering of PPG is enhanced by both increased UGE and a delay in intestinal glucose absorption, which is likely due to transient inhibition of intestinal SGLT1. jnjmedicalconnect.comnih.govdiabetesjournals.org
Improvements in Beta-Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity
Studies suggest that this compound can lead to improvements in the function of beta-cells, the cells in the pancreas that produce insulin. plos.orgbjd-abcd.com This beneficial effect is thought to be an indirect result of reducing glucotoxicity, the harmful effect of high glucose levels on beta-cells. bjd-abcd.comdovepress.com By lowering blood glucose through increased urinary excretion, this compound lessens the demand on beta-cells to produce insulin. plos.org
In preclinical studies involving rodent models of type 2 diabetes, this compound treatment improved beta-cell function, as evidenced by an increased insulin-to-glucose ratio during an oral glucose tolerance test. plos.org Furthermore, in a polygenic mouse model of type 2 diabetes, this compound helped preserve beta-cell mass and function. diabetesjournals.org Clinical trials have also pointed to this compound's positive impact on beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity. clinicaltrials.gov One study showed that six months of this compound use improved HOMA-B, a measure of beta-cell function. bjd-abcd.com Another investigation revealed that adding this compound to existing therapy improved beta-cell function by 18%, although this finding was not statistically significant. dovepress.com
While insulin resistance is not a direct pharmacological target of this compound, some research indicates potential benefits. jnjmedicalconnect.com A pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies showed that this compound treatment was associated with improvements in the triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein-C (TG/HDL-C) ratio, a marker of insulin resistance. jnjmedicalconnect.com
Potential for SGLT1 Inhibition
This compound is not only an inhibitor of SGLT2 but also a low-potency inhibitor of SGLT1. diabetesjournals.org SGLT1 is a transporter protein primarily found in the small intestine, where it plays a key role in the absorption of glucose and galactose. diabetesjournals.org
Dose-Dependent Intestinal SGLT1 Inhibition and Delayed Oral Glucose Absorption
The inhibitory effect of this compound on intestinal SGLT1 is dose-dependent. jnjmedicalconnect.comeuropa.eu While systemic concentrations of this compound may not be sufficient to significantly inhibit SGLT1 throughout the body, transiently high concentrations within the intestinal lumen following oral administration can lead to local inhibition of SGLT1. diabetesjournals.orgdiabetesjournals.orgeuropa.eu This is particularly observed with higher doses, such as 300 mg. nih.govspringermedizin.deresearchgate.net
This localized and temporary inhibition of intestinal SGLT1 delays the absorption of glucose from the gut. nih.govnih.govdiabetesjournals.org A study using a dual-tracer method in healthy individuals demonstrated that a single 300 mg dose of this compound slowed the rate at which orally administered glucose appeared in the bloodstream during a mixed-meal tolerance test. nih.gov Specifically, the rate of oral glucose absorption was reduced by 31% in the first hour and 20% over the first two hours compared to placebo. jnjmedicalconnect.com This delay in glucose absorption is a key non-renal mechanism contributing to this compound's glucose-lowering effect. nih.govresearchgate.net
Contribution to Postprandial Glucose Lowering
The delayed intestinal glucose absorption resulting from SGLT1 inhibition directly contributes to the reduction of postprandial glucose (PPG), or blood sugar levels after a meal. nih.govspringermedizin.denih.gov By slowing the entry of glucose into the circulation, this compound helps to blunt the sharp spike in blood sugar that can occur after eating. diabetesjournals.orgnih.gov
Multiple studies have confirmed this effect. In healthy subjects, a 300 mg dose of this compound significantly reduced postprandial plasma glucose excursions. nih.gov The mean postprandial plasma glucose incremental area under the curve (ΔAUC) was lower by approximately 44% in the first hour, 35% in the first two hours, and 26% over six hours compared to placebo. nih.gov This effect on postprandial glucose is a distinct mechanism from the increased urinary glucose excretion caused by SGLT2 inhibition, providing an additional pathway for glycemic control. europa.eunih.gov
Beyond Glucose Lowering: Pleiotropic Effects and their Underlying Mechanisms
Beyond its primary glucose-lowering effects, this compound exerts several other beneficial actions, known as pleiotropic effects. These include alterations in renal hemodynamics.
Renal Hemodynamic Alterations
This compound has been shown to induce changes in the hemodynamics of the kidneys, which are thought to contribute to its long-term renal protective effects. tandfonline.comphysiology.org
A key hemodynamic effect of this compound is the reduction of pressure within the glomeruli, the filtering units of the kidneys. tandfonline.comnih.gov This is achieved through a mechanism involving the restoration of tubuloglomerular feedback. e-dmj.org By inhibiting SGLT2 in the proximal tubules, this compound increases the delivery of sodium to the macula densa, a specialized group of cells in the distal tubule. physiology.orge-dmj.org This signals the afferent arteriole, the small artery that supplies blood to the glomerulus, to constrict. physiology.orge-dmj.org This vasoconstriction of the afferent arteriole leads to a decrease in blood flow into the glomerulus, thereby lowering the intraglomerular pressure. physiology.orgnih.gove-dmj.org
This reduction in intraglomerular pressure is believed to be a major factor in the renoprotective effects observed with this compound and other SGLT2 inhibitors. tandfonline.comnih.govahajournals.org By alleviating the hyperfiltration and pressure that can damage the glomeruli over time, particularly in individuals with diabetes, this compound may help to slow the progression of kidney disease. nih.govjacc.org
Table of Research Findings on this compound's Mechanisms
Mechanistic Aspect | Key Finding | Source |
---|---|---|
Beta-Cell Function | Improved HOMA-B after 6 months of treatment. | bjd-abcd.com |
In a polygenic mouse model, preserved beta-cell mass and function. | diabetesjournals.org | |
In rodent models, improved insulin/glucose ratio during OGTT. | plos.org | |
SGLT1 Inhibition | Dose-dependent, transient inhibition of intestinal SGLT1. | jnjmedicalconnect.comeuropa.eu |
Delayed oral glucose absorption, especially with the 300 mg dose. | nih.govnih.govdiabetesjournals.org | |
Postprandial Glucose | Reduced postprandial glucose excursions via delayed glucose absorption. | diabetesjournals.orgnih.govspringermedizin.de |
35% reduction in postprandial glucose incremental AUC over 2 hours with 300 mg dose. | nih.gov | |
Renal Hemodynamics | Decreased intraglomerular pressure. | tandfonline.comnih.gov |
Table of Mentioned Chemical Compounds
Compound Name |
---|
This compound |
Glimepiride |
Metformin |
Pioglitazone |
Sitagliptin |
Vildagliptin |
Dapagliflozin |
Empagliflozin |
Sotagliflozin |
Galactose |
Acetaminophen |
Teneligliptin |
Luseogliflozin |
Nicotinamide |
Effects on Renal Tubular Glucose Reabsorption and Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Loss
This compound is an inhibitor of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2), which is found in the proximal renal tubules and is responsible for reabsorbing the majority of glucose filtered by the kidneys. nih.govspringermedizin.de By inhibiting SGLT2, this compound reduces the reabsorption of filtered glucose, lowers the renal threshold for glucose, and consequently increases the excretion of glucose in the urine. jnjmedicalconnect.comtandfonline.com This mechanism is independent of insulin secretion. nih.gov The glucose-lowering efficacy of this compound is related to the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as the amount of urinary glucose excretion depends on the GFR. springermedizin.detandfonline.com
In patients with type 2 diabetes, this compound has been shown to cause an initial, temporary reduction in the estimated GFR (eGFR). tandfonline.comnih.gov However, these changes tend to stabilize or lessen over time and are reversible after stopping the treatment, which suggests the absence of renal damage. tandfonline.com In the long term, this compound has been demonstrated to slow the decline of eGFR. nih.gov The mechanism for this is believed to be the increased delivery of sodium to the juxtaglomerular apparatus, which leads to vasoconstriction of the afferent arteriole, reducing intraglomerular pressure and hyperfiltration. nih.govphysiology.org
Cardiovascular Systemic Effects
Blood Pressure Reduction Mechanisms (e.g., osmotic diuresis, natriuresis)
This compound has been shown to lower both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. nih.gov The primary mechanisms behind this blood pressure reduction are thought to be osmotic diuresis and natriuresis. nih.govnih.gov By increasing urinary glucose excretion, this compound induces an osmotic diuretic effect, leading to a reduction in plasma volume. nih.govtandfonline.com It also promotes natriuresis, the excretion of sodium in the urine, by inhibiting sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubules. physiology.orgtandfonline.com
Other potential contributing factors to blood pressure reduction include weight loss and a possible reduction in arterial stiffness. nih.govtandfonline.com Some research also suggests a local inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system due to increased sodium delivery to the juxtaglomerular apparatus. nih.gov
Influence on Plasma Volume
This compound has a notable effect on plasma volume. Studies have shown that treatment with this compound leads to a reduction in plasma volume. nih.govucl.ac.uk This effect is a result of the osmotic diuresis caused by increased urinary glucose excretion. ucl.ac.uk One study observed a transient decrease in plasma volume at the beginning of treatment, which was largely attenuated by week 12. nih.gov Another study involving patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic heart failure found that this compound significantly reduced estimated plasma volume over 24 weeks, irrespective of whether patients were also taking conventional diuretics. researchgate.net This reduction in intravascular volume is considered a key contributor to the cardiovascular benefits of this compound. ahajournals.org
Impact on Serum Lipids (e.g., total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides)
The effects of this compound on serum lipids have been a subject of various studies, with some reporting mixed results. Generally, this compound has been associated with an increase in both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). mdpi.comlipid.org
A meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials indicated that this compound showed the largest effect in increasing LDL-C among the SGLT2 inhibitors studied. lipid.org The CANVAS trial also reported a slight increase in both HDL-C and LDL-C in patients treated with this compound compared to placebo. mdpi.com
Regarding triglycerides, some studies have shown a trend towards a decrease with this compound treatment. nih.govresearchgate.net A meta-analysis found that this compound significantly reduced triglycerides. lipid.org
One study suggested that the increase in HDL-C may be related to a reduction in angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) expression. nih.gov The mechanisms behind the changes in LDL-C are thought to involve reduced clearance of circulating LDL and increased lipolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. mdpi.com
Table 1: Effect of this compound on Serum Lipids (Select Studies)
Neuroprotective Properties and Brain Aging
Recent research has begun to explore the neuroprotective potential of this compound and its effects on brain aging.
Modulation of Central Insulin Sensitivity
Studies in animal models suggest that this compound may have beneficial effects on the brain, including improved central insulin responsiveness. nih.govresearchgate.net In aged male mice, this compound treatment has been shown to enhance hypothalamic insulin sensitivity. researchgate.net This is significant because brain insulin resistance is implicated in cognitive decline and neurodegenerative diseases. mdpi.com By improving central insulin signaling, this compound may help to mitigate some of the age-related changes in the brain. nih.govresearchgate.net Furthermore, research in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease has indicated that this compound treatment can improve cognition and reduce neuroinflammation. biorxiv.orgmdpi.com
Effects on mTOR Signaling
This compound has been shown to influence the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, a crucial regulator of cellular growth and metabolism. jst.go.jpnih.gov In studies on glioblastoma cells, this compound demonstrated an ability to inhibit cell growth by enhancing the phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and suppressing the phosphorylation of S6 protein and p70S6 kinase, which are downstream targets of mTOR. jst.go.jp This suggests that this compound activates AMPK and subsequently inhibits the mTOR pathway, leading to reduced glioblastoma growth both in laboratory settings and in animal models. jst.go.jp
Further research indicates that the reduction in mTORC1 signaling is a common mechanism shared with other treatments that extend lifespan. nih.gov Interestingly, the effect of this compound on mTOR signaling appears to be sex-specific, with a reduction in mTORC1 and ERK1-2 signaling observed only in male mice, which corresponds with the lifespan extension seen exclusively in males. nih.govaging-us.com This modulation of the mTOR pathway is also implicated in the drug's ability to interrupt inflammatory signaling in certain cancer models. nih.gov In renal cells, this compound has been observed to induce autophagy by regulating the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathways. researchgate.net
The mechanism by which this compound inhibits the mTOR pathway may also be linked to its effects on the AKT/mTOR axis. In hepatocellular carcinoma cells, this compound was found to inhibit HIF-1α protein accumulation, a key factor in tumor metastasis and angiogenesis, by targeting the AKT/mTOR pathway. mdpi.com
Reduction of Neuroinflammation
This compound has demonstrated significant neuroprotective effects by reducing neuroinflammation. aging-us.commdpi.com Studies in aged mice have shown that this compound treatment can significantly decrease age-associated hypothalamic gliosis, which is an increase in the number of glial cells in response to central nervous system damage, along with a reduction in the production of inflammatory cytokines by microglia. researchgate.netnih.gov Specifically, in the hypothalamus and hippocampus of aged male mice, this compound treatment led to a notable reduction in neuroinflammation. aging-us.comnih.gov
The anti-inflammatory effects of this compound in the brain appear to be sex-specific. In the hippocampus, this compound reduced both microgliosis and astrogliosis in male mice, but not in females. researchgate.netnih.gov This sex-dimorphic effect aligns with findings that aged male mice tend to have more robust neuroimmune responses than their female counterparts. researchgate.netnih.gov The reduction in microgliosis in males was partially correlated with decreased phosphorylation of S6 kinase in microglia. researchgate.netnih.gov
The mechanisms underlying this compound's anti-inflammatory properties in the central nervous system are multifaceted. They are thought to involve the modulation of inflammatory pathways and nutrient signaling. aging-us.com For instance, some of its neuroprotective effects may be mediated through the inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome, a key component of the innate immune system linked to brain aging and degenerative diseases. aging-us.com Furthermore, this compound has been shown to alleviate high glucose-induced inflammatory toxicity in microglia by repressing proinflammatory factors and reducing signaling activities of pathways like NFκB, JNK, and p38. mdpi.com
Improvement in Neuromuscular Function and Locomotor Activity
This compound treatment has been associated with improvements in neuromuscular function and locomotor activity, particularly in aged male mice. aging-us.com Research has demonstrated that this compound treatment improved exploratory and locomotor activity in 30-month-old male mice, an effect not observed in their female counterparts. researchgate.netnih.gov This suggests a sex-specific neuroprotective benefit of the drug on motor function during aging. aging-us.comresearchgate.netnih.gov
In a different experimental model using rats, this compound treatment was found to significantly reduce increased levels of locomotor activity induced by valproic acid. nih.gov While this may seem contradictory, it highlights the context-dependent effects of the drug on motor behavior, potentially by normalizing hyperactivity in certain pathological states. One study noted that this compound treatment increased energy expenditure without affecting ambient locomotor activity in specific mouse models. portlandpress.com
The improvement in neuromuscular function may be linked to the broader neuroprotective effects of this compound, including the reduction of neuroinflammation and improved central insulin sensitivity, which are also predominantly observed in males. aging-us.comresearchgate.netnih.gov
Hepatic Effects, Liver Steatosis, and Fibrosis
This compound has demonstrated beneficial effects on the liver, particularly in the context of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its progression. nih.govjst.go.jp Multiple studies have shown that this compound can improve hepatic steatosis, which is the accumulation of fat in the liver. nih.govjst.go.jp In a six-month prospective study involving patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD, this compound significantly reduced hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF), a measure of liver fat, from a median of 20.6% to 10.6%. nih.govjst.go.jp
The mechanisms behind the improvement in hepatic steatosis are thought to include reductions in body weight, visceral fat, and improvements in insulin resistance and inflammation. nih.gov A large secondary analysis of the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials, involving over 10,000 patients with type 2 diabetes, found that this compound treatment resulted in improvements in liver biochemistry. oup.com Specifically, a composite endpoint of a greater than 30% improvement in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels or normalization of ALT levels occurred in 35.2% of patients receiving this compound compared to 26.4% in the placebo group. oup.com
Beyond steatosis, this compound may also positively impact liver fibrosis. The same large analysis showed that this compound led to improvements in some noninvasive tests for fibrosis. oup.com In animal models of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), this compound inhibited the development of hepatic fibrosis. jofem.org A post hoc analysis of the CREDENCE trial also suggested that this compound reduces biomarkers related to inflammation and fibrosis. springermedizin.de
Table 1: Effects of this compound on Hepatic Parameters
Parameter | Study Population | Key Findings | Citation |
Hepatic Steatosis (PDFF) | Patients with T2DM and NAFLD | Significant reduction in hepatic PDFF after 6 months of treatment. | nih.gov, jst.go.jp |
Liver Biochemistry (ALT) | Patients with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk | Higher percentage of patients achieving >30% improvement or normalization of ALT levels compared to placebo. | oup.com |
Liver Fibrosis Markers | Patients with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk | Improvements in some noninvasive tests of fibrosis. | oup.com |
Hepatic Fibrosis Development | NASH model mice | Inhibition of the development of hepatic fibrosis. | jofem.org |
Anti-proliferative Action in Endothelial Cells
This compound exerts a notable anti-proliferative effect on endothelial cells, the cells that line blood vessels. This action has been observed in various studies and appears to be a characteristic that distinguishes it from some other SGLT2 inhibitors. frontiersin.orgnih.gov
Research has consistently shown that this compound inhibits the proliferation of human endothelial cells in a concentration-dependent manner. frontiersin.orgnih.govresearchgate.net For instance, a 10 μM concentration of this compound was found to reduce endothelial cell proliferation by approximately 45%. frontiersin.orgnih.gov This inhibitory effect occurs without causing cell death and is associated with a decrease in DNA synthesis. frontiersin.orgnih.gov
In addition to inhibiting proliferation, this compound markedly attenuates the ability of endothelial cells to form tube-like structures, a critical step in the process of angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels). frontiersin.orgnih.gov A high concentration of this compound (50 μM) was shown to reduce tube formation by 65% and endothelial cell sprouting from mouse aortas by 80%. frontiersin.orgnih.gov This robust inhibition of both proliferation and tube formation is a key aspect of this compound's action on the vasculature. frontiersin.orgmdpi.com It has been suggested that this anti-angiogenic property could be beneficial in conditions like proliferative diabetic retinopathy but may also contribute to an increased risk of limb amputation in certain patient populations by impairing vascular repair. mdpi.com
A significant part of this compound's anti-proliferative mechanism in endothelial cells is the blockade of cyclin A expression. frontiersin.orgnih.gov The inhibition of endothelial cell growth by this compound is associated with cell cycle arrest and a striking decrease in the levels of cyclin A. frontiersin.orgnih.gov Cyclins are a family of proteins that control the progression of cells through the cell cycle.
The importance of this blockade is highlighted by experiments where the restoration of cyclin A expression, through adenoviral-mediated gene transfer, partially rescued the proliferative response of endothelial cells treated with this compound. frontiersin.orgnih.gov While the inhibition of cyclin A is a key contributor, it is likely that other unidentified mediators are also involved in the full anti-proliferative effect of this compound. frontiersin.org The mechanism by which this compound suppresses cyclin A expression is not fully understood but may be related to the blockade of mitochondrial metabolism. mdpi.com
Table 2: Effects of this compound on Endothelial Cell Function
Effect | Cell Type | Key Findings | Citation |
Inhibition of Proliferation | Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) | ~45% reduction in proliferation at 10 μM concentration. | frontiersin.org, nih.gov |
Inhibition of Tube Formation | Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) | 65% attenuation of tube formation at 50 μM concentration. | frontiersin.org, nih.gov |
Blockade of Cyclin A Expression | Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) | Striking decrease in cyclin A expression, contributing to anti-proliferative effect. | frontiersin.org, nih.gov |
Pharmacodynamics of Canagliflozin
Dose-Dependent Effects on Renal Threshold for Glucose (RTG)
Canagliflozin demonstrates a dose-dependent reduction in the renal threshold for glucose (RTG). In healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes, administration of this compound leads to a decrease in the plasma glucose concentration at which glucose begins to appear in the urine. Studies indicate that this compound doses of 100 mg and 300 mg once daily can suppress RTG throughout a 24-hour period. Maximal suppression of mean RTG over 24 hours has been observed with the 300 mg daily dose, lowering it to approximately 70-90 mg/dL (4-5 mM) from a starting value of around 240 mg/dL (13 mmol/L). jnjmedicalconnect.comdrugbank.comnih.gov Doses as low as 10 mg have also shown a dose-dependent decrease in calculated mean RTG in healthy men, with maximal reductions reaching approximately 60 mg/dL. researchgate.netresearchgate.net
Dose-Dependent Increases in Urinary Glucose Excretion (UGE)
Consistent with its effect on RTG, this compound causes a dose-dependent increase in urinary glucose excretion (UGE). Following single and multiple oral doses, this compound administration results in increased UGE, with the magnitude of this effect correlating with the administered dose. jnjmedicalconnect.comdrugbank.comnih.govplos.org In patients with type 2 diabetes, doses of 100 mg and 300 mg once daily led to mean increases in 24-hour UGE of approximately 100 g/day . jnjmedicalconnect.com Higher doses, such as 100 mg and above, generally resulted in UGE increases ranging from approximately 80 to 120 g/day . nih.govplos.org An apparent saturation of the 24-hour UGE response was observed with doses exceeding 200 mg/day. plos.org The increase in UGE is sustained over the dosing period, indicating a consistent pharmacodynamic effect. nih.govplos.org
Table 1: Dose-Dependent Urinary Glucose Excretion (UGE) and Renal Threshold for Glucose (RTG) with this compound
Dose (mg) | Mean 24-h UGE ( g/day ) | Maximal RTG Reduction (mg/dL) | Reference |
30 | ~60 | Not specified | researchgate.netplos.org |
100 | 80-120 | 72-90 | jnjmedicalconnect.comdrugbank.comnih.govresearchgate.netplos.org |
300 | 80-120 | 70-90 | jnjmedicalconnect.comdrugbank.comnih.govresearchgate.netplos.org |
≥100 | 80-110 | 70-90 | nih.govplos.org |
>200 | ~80-120 (saturation) | ~72-90 (near-maximal) | plos.org |
Note: Values are approximate and based on various study populations (healthy volunteers, patients with type 2 diabetes).
Time to Maximal Effect and Sustained Action
This compound acts rapidly to decrease RTG and increase UGE. These effects are observed from the first day of treatment and are generally sustained throughout the dosing period. nih.govplos.org Following oral administration, peak plasma concentrations are typically achieved within 1 to 2 hours. nih.goveuropa.eu The pharmacodynamic effects, such as the reduction in RTG and increase in UGE, are maintained over the 14-day dosing period with each dose. nih.govplos.org For doses of 100 mg and above, near-maximal suppression of RTG is sustained throughout the 24-hour dosing period. drugbank.complos.org The 100 mg dose provides near-maximal reduction in RTG for approximately 12 hours, with a modest waning of effect during the overnight period, while the 300 mg dose provides near-maximal effects on RTG throughout the full 24-hour dosing interval. drugbank.com
Effects on Serum Uric Acid and Creatinine
This compound treatment has been associated with reductions in serum uric acid levels. A meta-analysis of clinical trials indicated that this compound consistently reduced circulating uric acid concentrations by approximately 13% compared to placebo, with similar effects observed for both 100 mg and 300 mg daily doses. aston.ac.uknih.govdovepress.com This reduction is thought to be related to increased urinary uric acid excretion. aston.ac.uk In patients with hyperuricemia, this compound also demonstrated a significant reduction in serum uric acid levels, with a higher percentage of patients achieving target levels compared to placebo. nih.gov
Table 2: Effects of this compound on Serum Uric Acid
Treatment Group | Change in Serum Uric Acid (vs. Placebo) | Duration | Reference |
This compound 100 mg | ~13% reduction | 26 weeks | nih.gov |
This compound 300 mg | ~13% reduction | 26 weeks | nih.gov |
This compound (pooled) | ~13% reduction (~0.7 mg/dL) | 6-12 months | aston.ac.ukdovepress.com |
Note: Reductions are placebo-subtracted.
Impact on Urinary Sodium Excretion
This compound can lead to transient increases in urinary sodium excretion. Studies have shown that urinary sodium excretion can increase rapidly within 24 hours of administration, although it may return to baseline levels after approximately 96 hours. frontiersin.org This effect appears to be linked to the osmotic diuresis induced by SGLT2 inhibition. mdpi.comfrontiersin.org While urine volume may be slightly increased on the first day of dosing, subsequent changes after repeated doses for 14 days were generally small. nih.gov Urinary sodium excretion showed a tendency to be higher in the early treatment period, with time-course profiles similar to those of urine volume changes. nih.govfrontiersin.org However, no particular changes were observed in serum osmolality or hematocrit. nih.gov
Table 3: Impact of this compound on Urinary Sodium Excretion
Observation | Finding | Timeframe | Reference |
Urinary Sodium Excretion | Rapidly increased within 24 h, returned to baseline after 96 h. | Acute/Transient | frontiersin.org |
Urinary Sodium Excretion (Day 1) | Showed time-course profiles similar to urine volume changes. | Day 1 | nih.govfrontiersin.org |
Urinary Sodium Excretion | Tended to be higher in the early treatment period. | Early treatment | nih.gov |
Urinary Electrolyte Excretion | No clinically meaningful changes observed (excluding sodium). | Day 16 | researchgate.netplos.org |
Compound List:
this compound
Glucose
Sodium
Uric Acid
Creatinine
Insulin
Plasma Glucose
Serum Uric Acid
Serum Creatinine
Urinary Glucose
Urinary Sodium
Albuminuria
Hematocrit
Potassium
Chloride
Calcium
Magnesium
Inorganic Phosphorus
Metformin
Glyburide
Simvastatin
Warfarin
Hydrochlorothiazide
Oral Contraceptives
Probenecid
Cyclosporine
Rifampin
Ethinyl Estradiol
Levonorgestrel
Erythropoietin
Hepcidin
Digoxin
Digitoxin
Clinical Efficacy and Outcomes Research
Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Canagliflozin has demonstrated robust efficacy in improving glycemic control in patients with T2DM, both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihyperglycemic agents.
Reduction in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
Clinical trials consistently show that this compound, at recommended doses, significantly reduces HbA1c levels. When used as monotherapy in patients inadequately controlled with diet and exercise, this compound 100 mg and 300 mg resulted in mean HbA1c reductions of -0.77% and -1.03%, respectively, compared to placebo at 26 weeks nih.gov. Over a 52-week period, these reductions were sustained, with mean HbA1c decreases of -0.81% and -1.11% for the 100 mg and 300 mg doses, respectively, compared to placebo/sitagliptin researchgate.net.
As add-on therapy to metformin, this compound 100 mg and 300 mg lowered HbA1c by approximately 0.59%–0.74% compared to placebo dovepress.com. In general, this compound 100 mg and 300 mg doses lower HbA1c by approximately 0.6%–0.8% compared to placebo dovepress.com.
Table 1: Mean HbA1c Reduction with this compound in Clinical Trials
Comparator/Context | This compound Dose | Mean HbA1c Reduction (%) | Study/Trial Context | Citation(s) |
Placebo (Monotherapy) | 100 mg | -0.77 | 26-week trial in diet/exercise controlled patients | nih.gov |
Placebo (Monotherapy) | 300 mg | -1.03 | 26-week trial in diet/exercise controlled patients | nih.gov |
Placebo/Sitagliptin (Monotherapy) | 100 mg | -0.81 | 52-week trial in diet/exercise controlled patients | researchgate.net |
Placebo/Sitagliptin (Monotherapy) | 300 mg | -1.11 | 52-week trial in diet/exercise controlled patients | researchgate.net |
Placebo (Add-on to Metformin) | 100 mg | -0.59 | Pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials | dovepress.com |
Placebo (Add-on to Metformin) | 300 mg | -0.74 | Pooled analysis of placebo-controlled trials | dovepress.com |
Sitagliptin 100 mg (Add-on to Metformin) | 300 mg | -0.9 vs -0.7 | Superior reduction compared to Sitagliptin nih.gov; Comparative efficacy data suggests greater reduction than DPP-4i dovepress.com | dovepress.comnih.gov |
Glimepiride (Add-on to Metformin) | 300 mg | Superior | Superior to Glimepiride in HbA1c lowering nih.govdiabetesjournals.org; appeared superior to sulfonylureas dovepress.com | dovepress.comnih.govdiabetesjournals.org |
Sitagliptin 100 mg (Add-on to Metformin) | 100 mg | Noninferior | Noninferior to Sitagliptin diabetesjournals.org | diabetesjournals.org |
Effects as Monotherapy and Add-on Therapy
This compound has proven effective when used as a standalone treatment or when added to existing antihyperglycemic regimens. As monotherapy, it significantly reduces HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and body weight in patients inadequately controlled by diet and exercise alone nih.govresearchgate.netwjgnet.com. When used as an add-on therapy, particularly to metformin, this compound further improves glycemic control, demonstrating reductions in HbA1c beyond what is achieved with metformin alone dovepress.comdiabetesjournals.org. Studies have also shown its efficacy when added to metformin and sulfonylureas, or metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors, maintaining significant HbA1c reductions dovepress.comnih.gov. In Japanese patients, this compound demonstrated sustained reductions in HbA1c and body weight for up to 52 weeks, whether administered as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antihyperglycemic drugs nih.gov.
Comparative Efficacy with Other Antihyperglycemic Agents
This compound has been directly compared with other classes of antihyperglycemic agents. In head-to-head trials, this compound 300 mg demonstrated superiority over sitagliptin 100 mg in reducing HbA1c levels, with mean reductions of -0.9% compared to -0.7% for sitagliptin when added to metformin nih.gov. Similarly, this compound 300 mg was found to be superior to glimepiride in lowering HbA1c when used as add-on therapy to metformin nih.govdiabetesjournals.org. Network meta-analyses suggest that this compound 300 mg is more effective than sitagliptin in reducing HbA1c and appears superior to sulfonylureas like glimepiride dovepress.comnih.gov. While this compound 100 mg was found to be noninferior to glimepiride and sitagliptin in HbA1c reduction, the 300 mg dose showed superior efficacy in these comparisons diabetesjournals.org.
Cardiovascular Outcomes
The CANVAS Program, a landmark cardiovascular outcomes trial, provided robust evidence for this compound's benefits in reducing cardiovascular events.
Reduction in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
The CANVAS Program, an integrated analysis of the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials, demonstrated that this compound significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke jnj.comahajournals.orgahajournals.orgnih.gov. Across the program, this compound achieved a 14% reduction in the risk of MACE compared to placebo (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.75–0.97) jnj.comahajournals.orgnih.gov. The event rate was 26.9 per 1000 patient-years with this compound versus 31.5 per 1000 patient-years with placebo ahajournals.orgnih.gov.
The CREDENCE trial, which included patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, also reported significant cardiovascular benefits. This compound reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke by 20% compared to placebo (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67–0.95) ahajournals.orgahajournals.org. In this trial, this compound reduced first cardiovascular events by 26% (HR: 0.74) and total cardiovascular events by 29% ahajournals.org.
Table 2: Reduction in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Trial/Program | Endpoint | Reduction (%) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Citation(s) |
CANVAS Program | MACE (CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke) | 14% | 0.86 (0.75–0.97) | jnj.comahajournals.orgahajournals.orgnih.gov |
CANVAS Program | MACE (CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke) | N/A | 26.9 vs 31.5 per 1000 PY | ahajournals.orgnih.gov |
CREDENCE Trial | MACE (CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke) | 20% | 0.80 (0.67–0.95) | ahajournals.orgahajournals.org |
CREDENCE Trial | First cardiovascular events | 26% | 0.74 | ahajournals.org |
CREDENCE Trial | Total cardiovascular events | 29% | 0.71 | ahajournals.org |
Pooled Hispanic (CANVAS+CREDENCE) | MACE | N/A | 0.71 (0.55, 0.92) | nih.gov |
Impact on Heart Failure Hospitalization
This compound has demonstrated a significant protective effect against heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. In the CANVAS Program, this compound reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) by 33% compared to placebo (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.52–0.87) jnj.comacc.orgreliasmedia.com. The trial also showed a 22% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalized HF (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67–0.91) acc.orgreliasmedia.comnih.gov and a 30% reduction in fatal or hospitalized HF (HR: 0.70) acc.orgnih.gov. Notably, the benefit on cardiovascular death or hospitalized HF appeared greater in patients with a history of HF at baseline, showing a 39% reduction compared to those without HF (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.46–0.80) reliasmedia.comnih.gov.
The CREDENCE trial also reported a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations. This compound reduced hospitalization for heart failure by 30% (HR: 0.70) ahajournals.orgahajournals.orgnih.gov2minutemedicine.com and the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure by 31% (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57–0.83) ahajournals.org.
Table 3: Impact on Heart Failure Hospitalization
Trial/Program | Endpoint | Reduction (%) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Citation(s) |
CANVAS Program | Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HHF) | 33% | 0.67 (0.52–0.87) | jnj.comacc.orgreliasmedia.com |
CANVAS Program | CV Death or Hospitalized HF | 22% | 0.78 (0.67–0.91) | acc.orgreliasmedia.comnih.gov |
CANVAS Program | Fatal or Hospitalized HF | 30% | 0.70 (0.55–0.89) | nih.gov |
CANVAS Program | CV Death or Hospitalized HF (prior HF history) | 39% | 0.61 (0.46–0.80) | reliasmedia.comnih.gov |
CREDENCE Trial | Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HHF) | 30% | 0.70 (0.47–0.80) | ahajournals.org |
CREDENCE Trial | CV Death or Hospitalization for Heart Failure | 31% | 0.69 (0.57–0.83) | ahajournals.org |
Compound Names Mentioned:
this compound
Sitagliptin
Glimepiride
Metformin
Empagliflozin
Dapagliflozin
Ertugliflozin
Liraglutide
Semaglutide
Albiglutide
Adverse Event Profiles and Safety Considerations Excluding Basic Compound Identification, Dosage/administration, and Chemical/physical Properties
Mechanism-Related Adverse Events
The SGLT2 inhibition by canagliflozin leads to increased glucose excretion in the urine, resulting in osmotic diuresis and potential changes in fluid balance. This mechanism contributes to several commonly observed adverse events.
Genital Mycotic Infections
This compound is associated with an increased incidence of genital mycotic infections, primarily candidiasis, in both women and men. This is attributed to the increased glucose concentration in the genitourinary tract, which can promote fungal growth.
In a pooled analysis of clinical studies (Population 1), the incidence of genital mycotic infections was significantly higher with this compound compared to placebo. In females, the incidence was 10.4% for the 100 mg dose and 11.4% for the 300 mg dose, compared to 3.2% for placebo. In males, the incidence was 4.2% for the 100 mg dose and 3.7% for the 300 mg dose, versus 0.6% for placebo tandfonline.comnih.govcapes.gov.brresearchgate.net.
In a broader pooled analysis (Population 2), similar trends were observed, with incidences in females of 14.7% (100 mg), 13.9% (300 mg), and 3.1% (control), and in males of 7.3% (100 mg), 9.3% (300 mg), and 1.6% (control) tandfonline.comnih.govcapes.gov.br.
These infections were generally mild to moderate in intensity, rarely serious, and infrequently led to treatment discontinuation tandfonline.comnih.govcapes.gov.brnih.govdovepress.com. Most events responded to standard antifungal therapies tandfonline.comnih.govcapes.gov.br.
The majority of these infections occurred within the first four months of treatment in women and the first year in men tandfonline.comnih.govcapes.gov.brresearchgate.net. Women with a prior history of vulvovaginitis and uncircumcised men were noted to have a higher risk researchgate.net.
Table 1: Incidence of Genital Mycotic Infections in Clinical Studies
Population | Sex | This compound 100 mg | This compound 300 mg | Placebo/Control |
1 | Female | 10.4% | 11.4% | 3.2% |
1 | Male | 4.2% | 3.7% | 0.6% |
2 | Female | 14.7% | 13.9% | 3.1% |
2 | Male | 7.3% | 9.3% | 1.6% |
Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)
This compound use has been associated with a small increase in the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs). However, studies indicate that these infections were generally similar in severity to those seen with placebo, and there was no increased risk of serious or upper UTIs nih.govdovepress.comnih.govoup.comdiabetesjournals.orgresearchgate.netfrontiersin.org.
In pooled analyses of Phase III studies, this compound 100 mg and 300 mg were linked to small increases in UTI incidence compared to control groups, without a clear dose-dependence nih.govopenaccessjournals.com. For instance, in one pooled dataset, UTI incidence was 4% with this compound 100 mg, 5.9% with 300 mg, and 4% with placebo openaccessjournals.com.
In the CANVAS program, the incidence of UTIs with this compound was comparable to placebo (40 vs. 37 events per 1000 patient-years) oup.com.
The proportion of patients experiencing recurrent UTIs remained low across all groups nih.gov.
Osmotic Diuresis-Related Events
The mechanism of SGLT2 inhibition inherently leads to osmotic diuresis, characterized by increased urine volume and frequency. This can manifest as several related adverse events.
this compound increases urinary glucose excretion, inducing osmotic diuresis which can lead to increased urination (polyuria) and more frequent urination (pollakiuria) dovepress.comdiabetesjournals.orgfda.govnih.govnih.govjnjmedicalconnect.comeuropa.eu.
Other commonly reported terms associated with osmotic diuresis include thirst, dry mouth, dry throat, urgency, and nocturia fda.govnih.govnih.govjnjmedicalconnect.com.
In pooled placebo-controlled phase 3 studies, the incidence of osmotic diuresis-related adverse events was higher with this compound compared to placebo. For example, events such as pollakiuria and polyuria occurred in 6.7% (100 mg) and 5.6% (300 mg) of patients treated with this compound, compared to 0.8% in the placebo group fda.govnih.gov.
These events were generally mild to moderate in intensity and infrequently led to discontinuation nih.govdiabetesjournals.org. The majority of these events with this compound occurred within the first six weeks of treatment nih.gov.
Volume Depletion-Related Events
The osmotic diuresis induced by this compound can lead to a reduction in intravascular volume, potentially causing volume depletion-related adverse events.
These events include hypotension, postural dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, syncope, and dehydration dovepress.comresearchgate.netopenaccessjournals.comfda.govnih.govnih.goveuropa.eueuropa.eujnjmedicalconnect.comfda.govmedcentral.com.
In pooled analyses of clinical studies, the incidence of volume depletion-related adverse events was dose-dependent, occurring more frequently with the 300 mg dose compared to the 100 mg dose and placebo europa.eujnjmedicalconnect.comfda.gov. For instance, in one pooled analysis of eight clinical trials, the incidence was 2.3% for this compound 100 mg, 3.4% for 300 mg, and 1.5% for comparator groups openaccessjournals.com. Another pooled analysis of four placebo-controlled studies reported incidences of 1.2% (100 mg), 1.3% (300 mg), and 1.1% (placebo) europa.eu.
Specific patient populations are at higher risk for these events. These include elderly patients (particularly those ≥75 years), patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), and patients taking concomitant loop diuretics openaccessjournals.comeuropa.eujnjmedicalconnect.comfda.govmedcentral.com.
These events most frequently occurred within the first three months of treatment europa.eu.
Table 2: Incidence of Volume Depletion-Related Adverse Events in Pooled Clinical Trials
Patient Group / Characteristic | Comparator Group (%) | This compound 100 mg (%) | This compound 300 mg (%) |
Overall Population (4 studies) | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Overall Population (8 studies) | 1.5 | 2.3 | 3.4 |
Patients ≥75 years | 2.6 | 4.9 | 8.7 |
eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² | 1.5 | 4.7 | 8.1 |
Specific Adverse Events of Interest
Beyond the mechanism-related events, certain specific adverse events require particular attention due to their potential severity or unique characteristics.
Ketoacidosis: Incidence and Contributing Factors
This compound, like other SGLT2 inhibitors, has been associated with an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), including euglycemic DKA (eDKA), where blood glucose levels may not be significantly elevated.
Studies suggest that this compound may carry a higher risk of DKA compared to other SGLT2 inhibitors, potentially due to its lower selectivity for SGLT2 over SGLT1 ajmc.comresearchgate.netcnodes.ca. This compound's inhibition of SGLT1 in the small intestine can lead to osmotic diarrhea and volume depletion, which are recognized predisposing factors for DKA ajmc.comcnodes.ca.
The SGLT2 inhibition mechanism itself may promote lipid oxidation and ketogenesis, possibly via volume depletion, contributing to the pathophysiological pathway of SGLT2 inhibitor-related DKA ajmc.com.
In a study using the FAERS database, this compound was associated with a higher hazard ratio (HR) for DKA compared to DPP-4 inhibitors (HR: 3.58) cnodes.ca. Another analysis reported an increased risk of DKA from 0.03% (comparator drugs) to 0.11% with this compound 300 mg in type 2 diabetic patients nih.gov.
Other contributing factors for DKA in patients taking this compound include pancreatic insulin deficiency, alcohol abuse, caloric restriction, and history of pancreatitis nih.govnih.gov.
Table 3: Incidence of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) with SGLT2 Inhibitors
Agent Class / Specific Agent | Comparator Class | Incidence Rate (per 1000 person-years) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
SGLT2 Inhibitors (Overall) | DPP-4 Inhibitors | 2.03 (1.83–2.25) | 2.85 (1.99–4.08) |
This compound | DPP-4 Inhibitors | N/A | 3.58 (2.13–6.03) |
Empagliflozin | DPP-4 Inhibitors | N/A | 2.52 (1.23–5.14) |
Dapagliflozin | DPP-4 Inhibitors | N/A | 1.86 (1.11–3.10) |
Note: Data from population-based cohort studies comparing SGLT2 inhibitors to DPP-4 inhibitors cnodes.ca. Specific placebo-controlled incidence rates for this compound alone are also noted nih.gov.
Amputation Risk: Observed Incidence and Ongoing Research into Mechanisms
The risk of lower limb amputations has been a significant area of investigation for this compound. Data from major clinical trials have yielded differing results, prompting further research into potential mechanisms.
In the This compound cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program , which included patients with T2DM at high cardiovascular risk, an increased risk of lower extremity amputations was observed. The incidence rate for this compound was 6.3 per 1000 patient-years (PYs), compared to 3.4 per 1000 PYs for placebo, resulting in a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.97 (95% CI, 1.41-2.75) jnjmedicalconnect.comnih.gov. This increased risk was noted for both 100 mg and 300 mg doses, with no clear dose-response relationship identified jnjmedicalconnect.com. The majority of these amputations were minor, predominantly affecting the toes nih.goveuropa.eu. Risk was found to be similar across various subgroups, including those with a history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), prior amputation, or reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ukkidney.org.
Conversely, the This compound and Renal Events in Diabetes withీ Atherosclerosis post-stroke Outcome (CREDENCE) trial , which enrolled patients with T2DM and albuminuric chronic kidney disease (CKD), did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the risk of atraumatic lower limb amputation between the this compound and placebo arms. The incidence rates were 12.3 per 1000 PYs for this compound and 11.2 per 1000 PYs for placebo, with an HR of 1.11 (95% CI, 0.79-1.56) jnjmedicalconnect.comjnjmedicalconnect.com.
A pooled analysis comparing the CANVAS Program and the CREDENCE trial revealed significant heterogeneity in the effect of this compound on amputation risk between the studies (Pheterogeneity = 0.02) nih.govdoi.org. Despite extensive analysis, no specific participant or trial-level factors were identified to fully explain this discrepancy nih.govdoi.org. While several hypotheses have been proposed, including drug-induced hypovolemia, dehydration, decreased tissue perfusion, increased hematocrit, blood viscosity, or arterial thrombosis, the precise mechanism remains unclear in the published medical literature jnjmedicalconnect.com. It is noteworthy that in August 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) removed the Boxed Warning regarding amputation risk from this compound's label, citing subsequent reviews that indicated a lower risk than initially described jnjmedicalconnect.com.
Table 1: Amputation Incidence Rates in Key Clinical Trials
Trial/Program | Treatment Group | Incidence Rate (per 1000 PYs) | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Reference |
CANVAS Program | This compound | 6.3 | 1.97 (1.41-2.75) | jnjmedicalconnect.com |
CANVAS Program | Placebo | 3.4 | - | jnjmedicalconnect.com |
CANVAS (100 mg) | This compound | 7 | - | www.gov.uk |
CANVAS (300 mg) | This compound | 5 | - | www.gov.uk |
CANVAS (Placebo) | Placebo | 3 | - | www.gov.uk |
CREDENCE | This compound | 12.3 | 1.11 (0.79-1.56) | jnjmedicalconnect.com |
CREDENCE | Placebo | 11.2 | - | jnjmedicalconnect.com |
Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk
This compound has also been evaluated for its impact on bone mineral density (BMD) and the risk of fractures.
Bone Mineral Density (BMD): Studies have reported that this compound may be associated with modest decreases in BMD. In older patients (aged 55-80 years) with T2DM, this compound treatment (100 mg and 300 mg) resulted in small, statistically significant reductions in total hip BMD over 104 weeks. Placebo-subtracted changes were -0.9% for the 100 mg dose and -1.2% for the 300 mg dose fda.govoup.com. Similar decreases at the total hip were observed after 2 years of treatment nih.gov. These changes in BMD, along with increases in bone turnover markers (such as serum collagen type 1 β-carboxy-telopeptide and osteocalcin), were correlated with weight loss, a known factor influencing bone metabolism oup.com. The mechanisms are thought to involve weight loss and potential reductions in estradiol levels in women oup.com.
Table 2: Fracture Incidence and BMD Changes Associated with this compound
Study/Measure | Treatment Group | Incidence/Change (%) | Reference |
Fracture Incidence | |||
CANVAS Program (Fracture AE incidence) | This compound | 4.0% | nih.gov |
CANVAS Program (Fracture AE incidence) | Placebo | 2.6% | nih.gov |
Pooled Non-CANVAS Studies (Fracture AE incidence) | This compound | 1.7% | nih.gov |
Pooled Non-CANVAS Studies (Non-canagliflozin) | Comparator | 1.5% | nih.gov |
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Change (Total Hip) | |||
104-week study (Older patients) | This compound 100 mg | -0.9% (placebo-subtracted) | oup.com |
104-week study (Older patients) | This compound 300 mg | -1.2% (placebo-subtracted) | oup.com |
2-year study | This compound 100 mg | -1.7% | nih.gov |
2-year study | This compound 300 mg | -2.1% | nih.gov |
2-year study | Placebo | -0.8% | nih.gov |
Electrolyte Imbalances
This compound can influence serum electrolyte concentrations, with notable observations concerning potassium, magnesium, and phosphate.
Potassium: Studies have indicated that this compound is generally associated with small changes in serum potassium levels. Pooled analyses from four placebo-controlled trials showed that mean percent changes from baseline in potassium were slightly higher with this compound 100 mg and 300 mg compared to placebo nih.govtandfonline.com. Episodes of potassium elevation (defined as >5.4 mmol/L and >15% increase from baseline) occurred more frequently in patients treated with this compound, particularly the 300 mg dose, and were more prevalent in those with reduced eGFR nih.govtandfonline.comoup.commdpi.comnih.gov. While adverse events of hyperkalemia were uncommon, they were numerically higher in the CANVAS study with this compound compared to placebo oup.com. Transient increases in serum potassium have also been observed shortly after the initiation of this compound treatment openaccessjournals.com.
Table 3: Electrolyte Changes Associated with this compound
Electrolyte | Treatment Group | Change from Baseline (%) | Notes | Reference |
Potassium | This compound 100 mg | +0.6 (Week 26) | Small increase; higher incidence of elevation in patients with reduced eGFR. | nih.gov |
This compound 300 mg | +1.0 (Week 26) | Slightly higher increase than 100 mg; more frequent elevations in patients with reduced eGFR. | nih.gov | |
Placebo | +0.5 (Week 26) | nih.gov | ||
This compound 100 mg | 4.5% | Proportion of patients with potassium elevation (>5.4 mmol/L and >15% increase). | nih.gov | |
This compound 300 mg | 6.8% | Proportion of patients with potassium elevation (>5.4 mmol/L and >15% increase); higher in patients with reduced eGFR. | nih.gov | |
Placebo | 4.7% | Proportion of patients with potassium elevation (>5.4 mmol/L and >15% increase). | nih.gov | |
Magnesium | This compound | Small mean increase | Dose-dependent increase observed. | nih.govresearchgate.net |
Phosphate | This compound | Small mean increase | nih.gov |
Compound Names:
this compound
Canagliflozin in Special Populations
Patients with Renal Impairment
The efficacy and safety of canagliflozin are influenced by the degree of renal function. While this compound offers benefits in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), its effectiveness and potential risks vary with declining kidney function.
This compound has shown glycemic efficacy in patients with moderate renal impairment, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m² diabetesjournals.orgjnjmedicalconnect.com. In a pooled analysis of patients with stage 3 CKD (eGFR ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), this compound 100 mg and 300 mg resulted in mean HbA1c reductions of -0.38% and -0.47%, respectively, compared to placebo tandfonline.com. A phase 3 study in patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR ≥30 and <50 mL/min/1.73 m²) reported HbA1c reductions of -0.33% and -0.44% with this compound 100 mg and 300 mg, respectively, versus -0.03% with placebo at week 26 jnjmedicalconnect.com. Furthermore, the CREDENCE trial demonstrated that this compound provided renal and cardiovascular benefits across a wide eGFR range, down to 30 mL/min/1.73 m² jnj.com.
However, patients with an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² or creatinine clearance (CrCl) <60 mL/min experienced a higher incidence of adverse reactions related to volume depletion, including postural dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, and hypotension, particularly with the 300 mg dose europa.eueuropa.eu. In this subgroup, elevated potassium levels and greater increases in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were also observed europa.eu. Patients with moderate renal impairment concurrently taking medications that affect potassium excretion or the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system are at an increased risk of hyperkalemia nih.gov. The incidence rates of larger decreases in eGFR (>30%) during treatment were 7.3, 8.1, and 6.5 events per 100 patient-years for this compound 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo, respectively europa.eu.
The glycemic efficacy of this compound is dependent on renal function, with reduced efficacy in moderate renal impairment and likely absent efficacy in severe renal impairment europa.eu. Studies indicate a progressive attenuation of HbA1c reduction with declining eGFR ahajournals.org. For instance, placebo-adjusted mean differences in HbA1c decreased from -0.76% in patients with eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m² to -0.35% in those with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m² ahajournals.org.
Table 1: Glycemic Efficacy (HbA1c Reduction) in Different eGFR Strata
eGFR Category (mL/min/1.73 m²) | Placebo-Adjusted Mean HbA1c Difference (%) ahajournals.org | HbA1c Change (this compound vs. Placebo) nih.gov | Likelihood of >0.5% HbA1c Decrease (OR [95% CI]) nih.gov |
≥90 | -0.76 | - | - |
60 to <90 | -0.57 | -0.24% | 1.47 [1.27 to 1.67] |
45 to <60 | -0.45 | -0.14% | 1.12 [0.94 to 1.33] |
<45 | -0.35 | -0.08% | 0.99 [0.83 to 1.18] |
Before initiating this compound, renal function must be assessed nih.goveuropa.eu. Initiation is not recommended for patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² or CrCl <30 mL/min nih.goveuropa.eumedscape.comeuropa.eu. This compound is contraindicated in patients on dialysis or with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) nih.goveuropa.eu. For patients with an eGFR between 30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m², the daily dose of this compound should be limited to 100 mg europa.eumedscape.comeuropa.eutrenddiabetes.online. If a patient already on this compound experiences a persistent drop in eGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m² or CrCl <60 mL/min, the dose should be adjusted to or maintained at 100 mg once daily europa.eueuropa.eu. Treatment should be discontinued if the eGFR persistently falls below 45 mL/min/1.73 m² or CrCl persistently falls below 45 mL/min europa.eueuropa.eu.
It is crucial to assess and correct volume status before initiating this compound, particularly in patients with renal impairment, the elderly, or those on concomitant diuretics, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs jnjmedicalconnect.comeuropa.eumayoclinic.orgmedcentral.comjnjmedicalconnect.com. Renal function should be monitored prior to therapy initiation and at least annually thereafter. For patients whose renal function is approaching moderate impairment, monitoring at least 2 to 4 times per year is recommended europa.eunih.goveuropa.eu.
Impact on Glycemic Efficacy with Declining Renal Function
Elderly Patients
This compound has been evaluated in elderly populations, revealing a generally consistent safety profile with younger patients, alongside specific considerations regarding efficacy and adverse events.
Table 2: Glycemic Efficacy (HbA1c Reduction) in Elderly vs. Younger Patients
Age Group | This compound 100 mg Placebo-Subtracted Mean Reduction (%) | This compound 300 mg Placebo-Subtracted Mean Reduction (%) |
≥75 years | -0.65 | -0.55 |
<75 years | -0.69 | -0.85 |
Elderly patients, especially those aged 75 years and older, are at an increased risk for volume depletion-related adverse reactions when treated with this compound europa.eumedcentral.comjnjmedicalconnect.comnih.govunirioja.esdiabetesincontrol.comdroracle.ai. These events, which include postural dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, and dehydration, are more pronounced with the 300 mg dose europa.eujnjmedicalconnect.com. Factors contributing to this increased risk include the concomitant use of loop diuretics, moderate renal impairment (eGFR 30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), and advanced age (≥75 years) jnjmedicalconnect.com.
Data from pooled analyses indicate that in patients ≥75 years, the incidence of volume depletion-related adverse events was 5.3 events per 100 patient-years for this compound 100 mg and 6.1 events per 100 patient-years for this compound 300 mg, compared to 2.4 events per 100 patient-years in the control group europa.eu. Another analysis reported incidence rates of 4.9% for this compound 100 mg and 8.7% for this compound 300 mg in participants aged 75 and older, versus 2.6% in the comparator group nih.govunirioja.esresearchgate.net.
Table 3: Incidence of Volume Depletion-Related Adverse Events in Elderly Patients
Age Group | This compound 100 mg (Events per 100 patient-years) europa.eu | This compound 300 mg (Events per 100 patient-years) europa.eu | Control Group (Events per 100 patient-years) europa.eu | This compound 100 mg (%) nih.govunirioja.esresearchgate.net | This compound 300 mg (%) nih.govunirioja.esresearchgate.net | Non-Canagliflozin (%) nih.govunirioja.esresearchgate.net |
≥75 years | 5.3 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 4.9 | 8.7 | 2.6 |
<75 years | - | - | - | 2.2 | 3.1 | 1.4 |
Glycemic Control and Safety Profile
Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk (e.g., CANVAS program)
The CANVAS Program, an integrated analysis of the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials, evaluated the cardiovascular outcomes of this compound in a large cohort of over 10,000 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were at high risk for or had a history of cardiovascular disease ahajournals.orgahajournals.orgjnj.comclinicaltrialsarena.com. The program included patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (66%) and those with at least two cardiovascular risk factors but no prior cardiovascular event (34%) bjd-abcd.com.
The primary endpoint of the CANVAS Program was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke ahajournals.orgahajournals.orgjnj.comclinicaltrialsarena.com. This compound demonstrated a significant reduction in this composite endpoint compared to placebo. Specifically, this compound achieved a 14% reduction in the risk of the primary composite endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75–0.97), indicating superiority over placebo (p=0.02) ahajournals.orgjnj.comclinicaltrialsarena.comajmc.com. This risk reduction was contributed to by reductions in nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR: 0.85), cardiovascular death (HR: 0.87), and nonfatal stroke (HR: 0.90) jnj.com.
Beyond the primary composite, this compound also significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) by 33% (HR: 0.67) jnj.comclinicaltrialsarena.com. Furthermore, the program assessed renal outcomes, showing a 40% reduction in a composite of sustained 40% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), renal replacement therapy, or renal death jnj.com. The benefits of this compound on cardiovascular and renal outcomes were found to be consistent across different levels of baseline kidney function, down to eGFR levels of 30 mL/min/1.73 m², and showed no statistical evidence of heterogeneity between primary and secondary prevention groups ahajournals.orgahajournals.org. A pooled analysis of CANVAS and CREDENCE data further indicated that this compound reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure by 30% (HR: 0.70) jacc.org.
Table 1: Key Cardiovascular Outcomes from the CANVAS Program
Outcome | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | P-value (Superiority) | Reference(s) |
Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke | 0.86 (0.75–0.97) | 0.02 | ahajournals.orgjnj.comclinicaltrialsarena.comajmc.com |
Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HHF) | 0.67 (0.52–0.87) | N/A | jnj.comclinicaltrialsarena.com |
Renal Composite (e.g., 40% eGFR reduction, renal replacement therapy, renal death) | 0.60 (0.47–0.77) | N/A | jnj.com |
CV death or HHF (Pooled CANVAS/CREDENCE) | 0.70 (0.62–0.79) | N/A | jacc.org |
Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy (e.g., CREDENCE trial)
The CREDENCE (this compound and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial specifically investigated the effects of this compound in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy, characterized by albuminuria and reduced eGFR nih.govrxfiles.caadameetingnews.org2minutemedicine.comahajournals.orgacc.orgahajournals.org. This trial enrolled 4,401 participants with an eGFR between 30 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m² and substantial albuminuria, who were randomized to receive either this compound 100 mg daily or placebo, in addition to optimized standard care nih.govadameetingnews.org.
The primary outcome of the CREDENCE trial was a composite endpoint comprising end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), doubling of serum creatinine, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes nih.govrxfiles.caadameetingnews.org2minutemedicine.comacc.orgwikijournalclub.org. This compound significantly reduced the risk of this primary composite endpoint by 30% compared to placebo (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59–0.82; p = 0.00001) nih.govadameetingnews.org2minutemedicine.comahajournals.orgacc.orgwikijournalclub.org. The trial was terminated early following a planned interim analysis due to overwhelming evidence of benefit adameetingnews.orgacc.orgwikijournalclub.org.
Specific renal benefits observed included a reduction in the doubling of serum creatinine (20.7 events per 1,000 patient-years [P-Y] with this compound vs. 33.8/1,000 P-Y with placebo) and end-stage kidney disease (20.4/1,000 P-Y vs. 29.4/1,000 P-Y) wikijournalclub.org. This compound also demonstrated a significant attenuation of the chronic decline in eGFR, reducing it by 60% and 65% in patients with initial eGFRs of 30 to <45 mL/min/1.73 m² and 45 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively nih.gov.
Cardiovascular outcomes were also positively impacted, with this compound reducing the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR: 0.69) jacc.orgahajournals.org. The trial demonstrated that this compound consistently reduced cardiovascular death or HHF across various baseline eGFR and albuminuria categories, suggesting broad renoprotective and cardioprotective effects jacc.org.
Table 2: Key Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes from the CREDENCE Trial
Outcome | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Reference(s) |
Primary Composite (ESKD, doubling of serum creatinine, or renal/CV death) | 0.70 (0.59–0.82) | <0.00001 | nih.govadameetingnews.org2minutemedicine.comahajournals.orgacc.orgwikijournalclub.org |
Doubling of Serum Creatinine | 20.7 vs. 33.8 /1000 P-Y | N/A | wikijournalclub.org |
End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) | 20.4 vs. 29.4 /1000 P-Y | N/A | wikijournalclub.org |
Cardiovascular death or Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HHF) | 0.69 (0.57–0.83) | <0.001 | jacc.orgahajournals.org |
Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HHF) | 0.61 (0.47–0.80) | <0.001 | ahajournals.org |
Patients on Specific Concomitant Therapies (e.g., insulin)
This compound has been evaluated as an add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who are using insulin, often in conjunction with other antihyperglycemic agents jnj.comdiabetesjournals.orgnih.govmedscape.comresearchgate.net. Studies have shown that when added to insulin therapy, this compound effectively improves glycemic control and reduces body weight jnj.comdiabetesjournals.orgmedscape.comresearchgate.net.
In a substudy of the CANVAS program, patients receiving insulin were randomized to placebo, this compound 100 mg, or this compound 300 mg jnj.commedscape.comresearchgate.net. At 18 weeks, this compound treatment resulted in statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to placebo. The 100 mg dose led to an HbA1c reduction of -0.62% (95% CI -0.69 to -0.54), and the 300 mg dose resulted in -0.73% (95% CI -0.81 to -0.65) medscape.comresearchgate.net. These improvements in glycemic control were maintained at 52 weeks, with reductions of -0.58% and -0.73% for the 100 mg and 300 mg doses, respectively medscape.comresearchgate.net.
Furthermore, research utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has indicated that this compound, when added to insulin therapy, can reduce the required daily insulin dose and mitigate the risk of hypoglycemia, while also flattening nighttime glycemic fluctuations diabetesjournals.org. Specifically, one study found that patients receiving this compound required a significantly smaller change in their daily insulin dose (3.9 units/day) compared to the control group (13.4 units/day) to achieve similar glycemic control diabetesjournals.org. These findings suggest that this compound can offer benefits for patients on insulin therapy by enhancing glycemic management and potentially allowing for a reduced insulin requirement.
Table 3: Efficacy of this compound as Add-on Therapy to Insulin
Parameter | This compound 100 mg vs. Placebo | This compound 300 mg vs. Placebo | Timeframe | Reference(s) |
HbA1c Reduction (%) | -0.62 (95% CI -0.69, -0.54) | -0.73 (95% CI -0.81, -0.65) | 18 weeks | medscape.comresearchgate.net |
HbA1c Reduction (%) | -0.58 (95% CI -0.68, -0.48) | -0.73 (95% CI -0.83, -0.63) | 52 weeks | medscape.comresearchgate.net |
Change in Daily Insulin Dose (units/day) | -3.9 | N/A | N/A | diabetesjournals.org |
Analytical Methodologies for Canagliflozin
Chromatographic Techniques
Chromatographic techniques are the cornerstone for the analysis of Canagliflozin, providing high-resolution separation from potential impurities and excipients. nih.govrsc.org High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) are the most frequently employed methods, often coupled with mass spectrometry for enhanced sensitivity and specificity. afjbs.comhealthinformaticsjournal.com
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
Numerous reverse-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) methods have been developed for the routine analysis of this compound. core.ac.ukpharmascholars.com These methods typically utilize a C18 column and a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of an acidic buffer and an organic solvent like acetonitrile or methanol. core.ac.uknih.gov Detection is commonly performed using a UV detector at wavelengths ranging from 214 nm to 290 nm. pharmascholars.comnih.gov
One validated RP-HPLC method employed an Inertsil ODS-3 column with a mobile phase of 0.02% formic acid and acetonitrile (40:60 v/v) at a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min, with detection at 230 nm. core.ac.uk This method demonstrated a linear response for this compound in the concentration range of 10-50 µg/ml. core.ac.uk Another study utilized a Supelcosil C18 column with a mobile phase of 0.2% v/v trifluoroacetic acid in water and acetonitrile (80:20 v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, with detection at 290 nm. nih.gov This method was found to be linear over a concentration range of 12.6–37.9 μg/mL. nih.gov
Column | Mobile Phase | Flow Rate (mL/min) | Detection Wavelength (nm) | Linearity Range (µg/mL) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inertsil ODS-3 (250×4.6mm, 5µ) | 0.02% Formic acid: Acetonitrile (40:60) | 1.2 | 230 | 10-50 | core.ac.uk |
ODS column (4.6 x150mm, 5μ) | Water: Acetonitrile (55:45 v/v) | 1.0 | 214 | 6-36 | pharmascholars.com |
Kromasil C18 (100 mm x 4.6 mm 5 µm) | Acetonitrile: Water (pH 2.5 with orthophosphoric acid) (50:50 v/v) | 1.0 | 260 | 10-200 | |
Supelcosil C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) | 0.2% v/v Trifluoroacetic acid in water: Acetonitrile (80:20 v/v) | 1.0 | 290 | 12.6-37.9 | nih.gov |
Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC)
UPLC methods offer advantages over traditional HPLC, including shorter run times, improved resolution, and lower solvent consumption. afjbs.com A validated UPLC method for the simultaneous determination of this compound and Metformin utilized a Hypersil Gold column with a mobile phase of methanol and 0.03 M phosphate buffer (80:20 v/v) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. afjbs.com Detection was carried out at 240 nm, and the method demonstrated linearity for this compound over a concentration range of 0.1–50 µg/mL. afjbs.com Another UPLC method for this compound employed a C18 column with a mobile phase of water and methanol (70:30) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min, with detection at 286 nm. impactfactor.org This method showed a limit of detection of 0.0039 µg/ml and a limit of quantification of 0.0119 µg/ml. impactfactor.org
Column | Mobile Phase | Flow Rate (mL/min) | Detection Wavelength (nm) | Linearity Range (µg/mL) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hypersil Gold (50 mm × 3 mm, 1.9 µm) | Methanol: 0.03 M phosphate buffer (80:20 v/v) | 0.4 | 240 | 0.1–50 | afjbs.com |
C18 BEH (100 mm × 2.1 mm 1.7 µm) | 0.1% Orthophosphoric acid (pH 3.0): Acetonitrile (30:70 v/v) | 0.25 | 260 | Not Specified | ijpsr.com |
C18 (100 x 2mm, 1.8µm) | Water: Methanol (70:30) | 1.0 | 286 | Not Specified | impactfactor.org |
Hyphenated Techniques (e.g., LC-MS/MS, UPLC-MS)
Hyphenated techniques, particularly liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), are highly sensitive and specific methods for quantifying this compound, especially in biological matrices like plasma and urine. scispace.comnih.govirjms.com These methods often employ an internal standard for accurate quantification. innovareacademics.in
An LC-MS/MS method was developed for the quantification of this compound in rabbit plasma using an Inertsil ODS C18 column and a mobile phase of 0.01M ammonium acetate and methanol (30:70 v/v). scispace.com The method was linear over a range of 5 ng/ml to 600 ng/ml. scispace.com Another UPLC-MS/MS method for quantifying this compound and its metabolites in rat plasma utilized a Waters XBridge BEH C18 column with a mobile phase of 0.1% acetonitrile–formic acid (75:15, v/v). nih.gov
Technique | Column | Mobile Phase | Linearity Range | Matrix | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LC-MS/MS | Inertsil ODS 5 µm C18, 50×4.60 mm | 0.01M Ammonium acetate: Methanol (30:70 v/v) | 5-600 ng/mL | Rabbit Plasma | scispace.com |
LC-MS/MS | Zorbax XDB phenyl (75 × 4.6 mm, 3.5 mm) | Methanol: Acetate buffer (80:20 v/v) | 10–7505 ng/mL | Human Plasma | innovareacademics.in |
UPLC-MS/MS | Waters XBridge BEH C18 (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.5 μm) | 0.1% Acetonitrile–formic acid (75:15, v/v) | Not Specified | Rat Plasma | nih.gov |
LC-MS/MS | Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm; 2.1 × 50 mm | Ammonium acetate 20 mM (pH 5): Acetonitrile | 10-5000 µg/L | Human Plasma, Serum, Urine | nih.gov |
Spectrophotometric Methods
Spectrophotometric methods, including UV spectrophotometry and spectrofluorimetry, offer simpler and more cost-effective alternatives for the quantification of this compound, particularly in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. bamu.ac.inresearchgate.net
UV Spectrophotometry
UV spectrophotometric methods are based on the measurement of the absorbance of this compound at its wavelength of maximum absorbance (λmax). phmethods.net In methanol, this compound exhibits a λmax at approximately 290 nm. phmethods.netajpaonline.com
One study developed a UV spectrophotometric method with a linearity range of 1-25 μg/ml and a correlation coefficient of 0.9998. bamu.ac.in The method was found to be precise with intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations ranging from 0.34% to 1.44% and 0.072% to 1.44%, respectively. bamu.ac.in Another method established linearity in the concentration range of 5-10 mcg/mL, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.084 mcg/ml and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.255 mcg/ml. phmethods.net
Solvent | λmax (nm) | Linearity Range | LOD | LOQ | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methanol | 288 | 1-25 µg/mL | Not Specified | 0.9123 µg/mL | bamu.ac.in |
Methanol | 290 | 5-10 µg/mL | 0.084 µg/mL | 0.255 µg/mL | phmethods.net |
Phosphate Buffer (pH 6.8) | Not Specified | 5-40 µg/mL | 2.38 µg/mL | 7.24 µg/mL | impactfactor.org |
Spectrofluorimetry
Spectrofluorimetry is a highly sensitive technique that measures the fluorescence of a compound. This compound exhibits native fluorescence, which can be exploited for its quantification. researchgate.netpharmasm.com A spectrofluorimetric method was developed using methanol as the solvent, with an excitation wavelength of 293 nm and an emission wavelength of 349 nm. researchgate.netpharmasm.com This method demonstrated a linear relationship in the concentration range of 100-500 ng/mL. researchgate.netpharmasm.com The LOD and LOQ were found to be 13.58 ng/mL and 41.15 ng/mL, respectively. researchgate.netpharmasm.com Another study utilized a synchronous spectrofluorimetric method with a Δλ of 50 nm, measuring the fluorescence intensity at a peak maximum of 291.8 nm, with a linearity range of 100–600 ng/mL. researchgate.netoup.com
Solvent | Excitation λmax (nm) | Emission λmax (nm) | Linearity Range (ng/mL) | LOD (ng/mL) | LOQ (ng/mL) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methanol | 293 | 349 | 100-500 | 13.58 | 41.15 | researchgate.netpharmasm.com |
Methanol | Synchronous (Δλ = 50 nm) | 291.8 | 100-600 | Not Specified | Not Specified | researchgate.netoup.com |
Applications in Biological Matrices and Pharmaceutical Formulations
The accurate quantification of this compound in both biological samples and pharmaceutical products is crucial for pharmacokinetic studies, quality control, and therapeutic monitoring. A variety of analytical methods have been developed and validated for this purpose, with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and UV-Visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometry being the most prevalent techniques. healthinformaticsjournal.comhealthinformaticsjournal.com
In Biological Matrices:
The analysis of this compound in biological matrices, primarily human plasma, is essential for understanding its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Several sophisticated methods have been established for this purpose:
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): Reverse-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) is a widely used technique for the determination of this compound in human plasma. ajrconline.orgresearchgate.net These methods often employ a C18 column and a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of an organic solvent (like acetonitrile or methanol) and an aqueous buffer. ajrconline.orgjyoungpharm.orgphmethods.net Detection is typically carried out using a UV detector at wavelengths around 290 nm or 214 nm. ajrconline.orgpharmascholars.com To enhance sensitivity and selectivity, some methods utilize fluorescence detection. rsc.org Sample preparation is a critical step, often involving protein precipitation with solvents like methanol or liquid-liquid extraction to isolate the drug from plasma components. ajrconline.orgrsc.org
Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS): For higher sensitivity and selectivity, especially for pharmacokinetic studies where concentrations can be very low, LC-MS/MS methods have been developed. nih.govscispace.com These methods offer the advantage of quantifying this compound with high precision and accuracy, even in complex biological matrices. nih.govscispace.com The LC-MS/MS technique has been successfully applied to pharmacokinetic studies in both human and rabbit plasma. nih.govscispace.com
Interactive Data Table: HPLC Methods for this compound in Biological Matrices
Method | Matrix | Extraction | Column | Mobile Phase | Detection | Retention Time (min) | Linearity Range |
RP-HPLC ajrconline.org | Human Plasma | Protein Precipitation (Methanol) | WATERS EA874 (250 ×4.6 mm, 5 μm) | Acetate buffer: acetonitrile: methanol (30:50:20, v/v), pH 4.5 | UV at 290 nm | 5.1 | - |
HPLC-FLD rsc.org | Human Plasma | Liquid-Liquid Extraction (Diethyl ether) | Nucleodur Isis C18 | 20 mM potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate: acetonitrile (45: 55, v/v) | Fluorescence (Ex: 280 nm, Em: 325 nm) | 2.8 | 16.13–6000 ng/mL |
LC-MS/MS nih.gov | Human Plasma | Protein Precipitation & LLE | - | - | MRM (m/z 462.3 → 191.0) | < 5 | 10–1000 ng/mL |
LC-MS/MS scispace.com | Rabbit Plasma | Liquid-Liquid Extraction (TBME) | Inertsil ODS 5 µm C18, 50×4.60 mm | 0.01M ammonium acetate: methanol (30:70 v/v) | ESI-MS/MS | - | - |
In Pharmaceutical Formulations:
Quality control of this compound in pharmaceutical dosage forms, such as tablets, is vital to ensure product quality and efficacy. The analytical methods employed for this purpose are designed to be simple, rapid, and accurate.
UV-Visible Spectrophotometry: This is a straightforward and cost-effective method for the estimation of this compound in bulk and tablet formulations. ajrconline.orgajpaonline.com The drug exhibits maximum absorbance at specific wavelengths in solvents like methanol, typically around 290 nm. ajrconline.orgajpaonline.com The method is validated for linearity, precision, and accuracy, making it suitable for routine quality control analysis. ajrconline.orgresearchgate.net
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): RP-HPLC methods are extensively used for the assay of this compound in tablets. pharmascholars.com These methods are known for their specificity and ability to separate this compound from any potential degradation products or excipients present in the formulation. wisdomlib.orgrjpbcs.com A typical HPLC system for this application would include a C18 column, a mobile phase of acetonitrile and water or a buffer, and UV detection. jyoungpharm.orgpharmascholars.com The percentage assay of this compound in marketed tablets has been found to be within acceptable limits using these methods. ajrconline.orgrjpbcs.com
High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC): HPTLC is another chromatographic technique that has been applied for the determination of this compound. ajrconline.org This method offers the advantage of analyzing multiple samples simultaneously.
Interactive Data Table: Analytical Methods for this compound in Pharmaceutical Formulations
Method | Formulation | Solvent/Mobile Phase | Column | Detection | Linearity Range (µg/mL) | % Recovery |
UV Spectrophotometry ajrconline.org | Tablets | Methanol | - | 290 nm | 5-25 | 100.47% |
UV Spectrophotometry ajpaonline.com | Tablets | Methanol | - | 290 nm | - | - |
RP-HPLC | Tablets | Acetonitrile: water pH 2.5 (50:50 v/v) | Kromasil C18 (100 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 µm) | UV at 260 nm | 10-200 | - |
RP-HPLC pharmascholars.com | Tablets | Water and acetonitrile (55:45 v/v) | ODS column (4.6 x 150mm, 5μ) | PDA at 214 nm | 25-150 | - |
RP-HPLC rjpbcs.com | Tablets | - | - | - | 75-450 | 99.20-100.85% |
Quality Control and Validation Standards (e.g., ICH guidelines)
The validation of analytical methods used for this compound is a critical requirement to ensure the reliability, accuracy, and reproducibility of the results. The International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines, particularly Q2(R1), provide a comprehensive framework for the validation of analytical procedures. wisdomlib.orghrpub.org These guidelines are widely followed in the pharmaceutical industry to ensure that analytical methods are suitable for their intended purpose.
The validation of an analytical method for this compound typically involves the evaluation of several key parameters:
Specificity: This ensures that the analytical method can accurately measure the analyte of interest (this compound) without interference from other components such as impurities, degradation products, or excipients in the matrix. wisdomlib.org Forced degradation studies are often conducted under various stress conditions (acidic, alkaline, oxidative, thermal, and photolytic) to demonstrate the stability-indicating nature of the method. wisdomlib.orghrpub.orgajrconline.org
Linearity: This establishes that the response of the analytical method is directly proportional to the concentration of this compound over a specified range. rjpbcs.com This is typically demonstrated by a high correlation coefficient (R²) value, which should be close to 1. pharmascholars.com
Accuracy: This refers to the closeness of the measured value to the true value. It is usually determined by recovery studies, where a known amount of pure this compound is added to a sample matrix and the percentage recovery is calculated. rjpbcs.com The acceptance criteria for recovery are typically within a narrow range, such as 98-102%. rjptonline.org
Precision: This demonstrates the degree of agreement among individual test results when the method is applied repeatedly to multiple samplings of a homogeneous sample. It is usually expressed as the relative standard deviation (%RSD) and is assessed at different levels:
Repeatability (Intra-day precision): Assesses precision over a short interval of time with the same analyst and equipment. jyoungpharm.org
Intermediate Precision (Inter-day precision): Assesses the precision within the same laboratory but on different days, with different analysts, or different equipment. pharmascholars.com The %RSD for precision studies should generally be less than 2%. rjptonline.org
Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ): The LOD is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample that can be detected but not necessarily quantitated as an exact value. ajrconline.orgpharmascholars.com The LOQ is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample that can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision and accuracy. ajrconline.orgpharmascholars.com These parameters are crucial for the analysis of samples with low concentrations of this compound.
Robustness: This is the ability of an analytical method to remain unaffected by small, deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage. wisdomlib.org Parameters that may be varied include the pH of the mobile phase, flow rate, and column temperature. ajpaonline.com
Numerous studies have reported the development and validation of analytical methods for this compound in accordance with ICH guidelines, demonstrating their suitability for routine quality control and bioanalytical applications. wisdomlib.orgajrconline.orgwisdomlib.orghumanjournals.com
Q & A
Q. What are the key considerations in designing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess canagliflozin’s renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes?
Methodological Answer: RCTs such as CREDENCE and CANVAS used double-blind, placebo-controlled designs with strict inclusion criteria (e.g., eGFR 30–90 mL/min/1.73 m² and albuminuria >300 mg/g creatinine) to target high-risk populations . Composite endpoints (e.g., end-stage kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine, or renal/cardiovascular death) were prioritized to capture multifactorial benefits. Hierarchical statistical testing ensured robustness in secondary outcome analyses, reducing type I error risks .
Q. How are composite endpoints structured in this compound trials to capture renal and cardiovascular outcomes simultaneously?
Methodological Answer: Composite endpoints integrate clinically significant events (e.g., dialysis, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction) to enhance statistical power and reflect real-world disease progression. For example, the CREDENCE trial’s primary outcome combined end-stage kidney disease, sustained eGFR decline, and renal/cardiovascular mortality, with pre-specified hierarchical testing to validate secondary outcomes like hospitalization for heart failure .
Q. What safety monitoring protocols are implemented in trials to detect adverse events like genital infections or volume depletion?
Methodological Answer: Adverse events (AEs) are systematically recorded using standardized case report forms. For genital mycotic infections, supplemental electronic forms captured symptom onset, severity, and treatment response. AE incidence rates are compared between treatment arms with adjusted hazard ratios, and sensitivity analyses assess dose-dependence or temporal patterns .
Advanced Research Questions
Q. How do researchers reconcile contradictory findings regarding this compound-associated amputation risks across clinical trials?
Methodological Answer: Discrepancies between CANVAS (increased amputation risk: HR 1.97) and CREDENCE (no significant risk) are analyzed via subgroup and meta-analyses. Differences in baseline populations (e.g., peripheral artery disease prevalence) and trial designs (e.g., CANVAS included participants with prior amputations) may explain variance. Sensitivity analyses in pooled datasets and observational studies (e.g., claims databases) further contextualize risks .
Q. What advanced statistical methods are used to analyze this compound’s blood pressure-lowering effects in chronic kidney disease (CKD) subgroups?
Methodological Answer: Post hoc analyses of CREDENCE employed mixed-effects models to assess systolic blood pressure (BP) changes across baseline BP strata. Interaction tests evaluated consistency in treatment effects, while time-to-event analyses quantified reduced need for additional BP-lowering therapies. These methods confirmed this compound’s BP benefits were independent of baseline antihypertensive regimens .
Q. How do network-based molecular models elucidate this compound’s mechanism of action in diabetic kidney disease (DKD)?
Methodological Answer: Omics data (transcriptomics, metabolomics) and literature-derived pathways are integrated into molecular networks. For example, this compound’s impact on fibrosis biomarkers (e.g., TGF-β1, collagen IV) and amino acid metabolism (e.g., hepatic arginine synthesis) is modeled to identify upstream regulators and downstream effectors. Experimental validation via cell culture and animal models confirms mechanistic hypotheses .
Q. What analytical quality-by-design (AQbD) strategies optimize HPLC quantification of this compound in pharmacokinetic studies?
Methodological Answer: Central composite design (CCD) optimizes critical parameters (e.g., mobile phase pH, flow rate) to resolve this compound/metformin peaks. Contour plots define method operable design regions (MODR), ensuring robustness across variable conditions. Forced degradation studies (acid/alkaline hydrolysis, oxidation) validate stability-indicating properties, supporting regulatory compliance .
Contradictory Data Analysis
Q. How do researchers address conflicting evidence on this compound’s fracture risk in type 2 diabetes?
Methodological Answer: Pooled analyses of Phase 3 trials and dedicated bone safety studies (e.g., CANVAS vs. CREDENCE) stratify participants by baseline fracture risk factors. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and MRI assess bone density/microarchitecture in animal models. Meta-regressions adjust for confounding variables (e.g., age, osteoporosis prevalence), clarifying that fracture risk is not significant in low-risk populations .
Methodological Innovations
Q. What novel biomarker panels are validated to predict this compound’s efficacy in metabolic syndrome components?
Methodological Answer: Targeted metabolomics identifies biomarkers like adiponectin, leptin, and free fatty acids, which correlate with this compound’s effects on insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism. Machine learning algorithms integrate these biomarkers with clinical variables (e.g., HbA1c, BMI) to develop predictive efficacy scores, validated in post hoc analyses of RCTs .
Retrosynthesis Analysis
AI-Powered Synthesis Planning: Our tool employs the Template_relevance Pistachio, Template_relevance Bkms_metabolic, Template_relevance Pistachio_ringbreaker, Template_relevance Reaxys, Template_relevance Reaxys_biocatalysis model, leveraging a vast database of chemical reactions to predict feasible synthetic routes.
One-Step Synthesis Focus: Specifically designed for one-step synthesis, it provides concise and direct routes for your target compounds, streamlining the synthesis process.
Accurate Predictions: Utilizing the extensive PISTACHIO, BKMS_METABOLIC, PISTACHIO_RINGBREAKER, REAXYS, REAXYS_BIOCATALYSIS database, our tool offers high-accuracy predictions, reflecting the latest in chemical research and data.
Strategy Settings
Precursor scoring | Relevance Heuristic |
---|---|
Min. plausibility | 0.01 |
Model | Template_relevance |
Template Set | Pistachio/Bkms_metabolic/Pistachio_ringbreaker/Reaxys/Reaxys_biocatalysis |
Top-N result to add to graph | 6 |
Feasible Synthetic Routes
Featured Recommendations
Most viewed | ||
---|---|---|
Most popular with customers |
Disclaimer and Information on In-Vitro Research Products
Please be aware that all articles and product information presented on BenchChem are intended solely for informational purposes. The products available for purchase on BenchChem are specifically designed for in-vitro studies, which are conducted outside of living organisms. In-vitro studies, derived from the Latin term "in glass," involve experiments performed in controlled laboratory settings using cells or tissues. It is important to note that these products are not categorized as medicines or drugs, and they have not received approval from the FDA for the prevention, treatment, or cure of any medical condition, ailment, or disease. We must emphasize that any form of bodily introduction of these products into humans or animals is strictly prohibited by law. It is essential to adhere to these guidelines to ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards in research and experimentation.